The Pleasures and Pains of Conditional Acceptance

The Pleasures and Pains of Conditional Acceptance | Tips on How to Get Your Research Published
Every scholar who submits his or her writing for publication in an academic or scientific journal does so in the hope that it will be accepted as is or with very few minor changes. As an ideal scenario, however, this sort of immediate acceptance does not happen as frequently as scholars might like. Rejection, especially the formulaic single-sentence kind that provides no feedback to assist the author with effective corrections and improvements, is far more common. However, there is a middle ground to be found in what is called conditional acceptance, which can inflict upon the professional author a combination of pleasure and pain.

Sometimes conditional acceptance is obvious because the editor concerned makes it absolutely clear that if the author revises the paper as requested, it will definitely be accepted for publication, but in many cases the editor’s intentions are not quite so obvious. Perhaps the editor has suggested that the paper cannot be published until the changes are made, but has not confirmed that successful publication in the journal will definitely be the result if the revisions are completed in a satisfactory manner. If this is the kind of ambiguous message you have received from a journal editor and you are planning to revise your work in accordance with the feedback, you may want to write to the editor to confirm that your paper will indeed be published or at the very least seriously reconsidered for publication if you complete the revisions requested and resubmit the manuscript.
Increase Your Chances of Getting Published
Whether or not you need to confirm conditional acceptance of your paper, keep in mind that the very fact that you received detailed commentary and criticism from the editor and perhaps the peer reviewers who assessed your writing for the journal is an extremely positive thing. Scholarly editors tend to be incredibly busy people and they neither bother to send writing on to peer reviewers (also incredibly busy people) nor waste their time providing detailed feedback unless they genuinely believe that writing potentially suitable for publication. This fact should come as an encouraging and pleasurable sensation no matter how difficult and painful the requested revisions may be to imagine and implement.

Working out exactly what the editor requires, reviewing your work with an eye to revising in ways that meet the journal’s needs while also maintaining the integrity of your research and then successfully making the necessary changes within any time limits set by the editor and without exceeding the journal’s word limits for your paper are the more painful parts of the process. If you read both the feedback you have received and your paper itself with as objective and open a mind as you can manage, your efforts will produce the best results. Remember to reach out for help as well: the assistance of knowledgeable colleagues or mentors and the services of a professional proofreader or editor may prove invaluable.

It is vital that all communication with the editor concerned be respectful and professional in tone and clear and specific in content. If you are unable to make every change that he or she requested, this should be explained in your correspondence, and you should provide reasons for your decisions – sound academic reasons, that is, such as ‘removing this paragraph would undermine the progression of my argument,’ rather than questionable personal ones such as ‘I simply do not have the time to reformat all my tables.’ If you are confirming in your letter that you will be making or have made most of the revisions requested by the editor, the few things that you are unable to change for valid reasons will communicate not inflexibility, but your intention to maintain the integrity of your scholarship as you accommodate the needs of the journal and eagerly work with the editor to produce the best paper possible.

Why Our Editing and Proofreading Services?
At we pride ourselves on our large and extremely dedicated team of academic and scientific professionals. Our proofreaders and editors are highly educated native speakers of English and their areas of specialisation range so widely that we are able to help our clients improve and perfect all kinds of research manuscripts for successful publication. Many members of our team work predominantly on articles intended for publication in scholarly journals, ensuring that formatting and references conform to author guidelines with precision and correcting grammar, punctuation, spelling and simple typing errors so that our customers are able to report their research in the clear and accurate ways required to impress acquisitions editors and earn publication.

Our editing services for authors of scientific papers and books are especially popular, but we have the experience and expertise to proofread and edit books in every scholarly discipline as well as beyond them, and some of our carefully trained proofreaders and editors work exclusively on helping students improve the formatting and language of their theses and dissertations. Whether you are preparing a conference paper for presentation or publicationpolishing a professional report to share with your colleagues, or tackling the daunting task of editing and perfecting any kind of academic or scientific document, a qualified member of our expert team can provide invaluable assistance and give you greater confidence in your written work. Our translation services for scientific and academic documents have also proven immensely helpful for many of our international clients.

topbanner errow