Benefitting Fully from Committee Feedback

Benefitting Fully from Committee Feedback

Oct 01, 2024Rene Tetzner

Benefitting Fully from Committee Feedback

Receiving feedback on drafts of your dissertation chapters may at times seem a mixed blessing, but it can be a positive and beneficial experience if you cope with it effectively. Since the usual procedure is to share your writing with your PhD supervisor first, receive his or her commentary and then revise your work in response, the parts of your dissertation that you share with your other committee members will usually be polished to some degree. This means that you will probably be dealing with fewer practical matters (such as writing style and formatting), but you will very likely need to deal with differences of academic or scientific opinion. Your committee members may disagree with each other, with you, with your supervisor and even with approaches you and your supervisor devised to resolve any initial disagreements the two of you had. Learning how to cope efficiently and professionally with what may be conflicting advice from your various committee members in order to work productively with them throughout your degree process is an essential aspect of successfully completing a doctoral dissertation.

You will certainly encounter contradictions as you write your dissertation: contradiction among the sources you consult; contradiction between your own work and those sources; contradiction among your committee members in terms of their advice as readers and scholars; and contradiction between your ideas and practices and those of your committee members. The number of members in your committee will make a difference, but both small and large committees have their pros and cons. Small ones mean less opportunity for contradictory advice and potentially more space for your own ideas and practices to flourish, but you also benefit from less and less diverse expertise and advice. Large committees, on the other hand, mean that you need to please more people, which can present many contradictions and, in some cases, become a little stifling, but you will benefit from a broader range of qualified readers and helpful opinions. Whatever the constitution of your dissertation committee may be, however, it was no doubt designed to meet your anticipated needs (interdisciplinary dissertations, for instance, often require more experts to cover the fields of study concerned and tend to involve a variety of potentially conflicting approaches), and almost every committee has the potential to guide a doctoral candidate through writing a successful dissertation. It is what you make of that potential that will determine your success.

Remember that your committee members have more experience than you do and are providing expert critical advice that can help you sharpen your thinking, improve your methodology, clarify your argument and meet the requirements of scholarly writing at the doctoral level as well as the needs of your anticipated readers. It is essential to remain professional and objective while reading the comments provided by your committee members, using each piece of advice in as beneficial a manner as possible, whether that means actually altering your approaches or simply explaining those approaches and your reasons for adopting them more precisely and thoroughly. If significant problems associated with conflicting advice from your committee members do arise, you should discuss them face-to-face with your supervisor initially and then, if necessary, with your other committee members (either individually or as a group). You should clearly state your own ideas and concerns in such meetings, point out contradictions in the advice you received, specify what you do not understand or what you think will not work and, if possible, suggest compromises that may lead to solutions with which everyone can feel satisfied. Most issues can be resolved in this way as long as you aim for honest and straightforward communication, maintain good manners, show respect for the ideas of others, demonstrate an open mind and combine it with a persistent focus on what you want your dissertation to do and be.

Contradiction lies at the heart of academic and scientific writing and debate. It is a healthy and inspirational aspect of quality scholarship that can improve your research and enhance your writing skills. Encountering and effectively dealing with it while working on your dissertation is not only a normal part of the degree process, but also excellent training for a successful academic or scientific career.

Why Our Editing and Proofreading Services?
At Proof-Reading-Service.com we offer the highest quality journal article editing, dissertation proofreading and online proofreading services via our large and extremely dedicated team of academic and scientific professionals. All of our proofreaders are native speakers of English who have earned their own postgraduate degrees, and their areas of specialisation cover such a wide range of disciplines that we are able to help our international clientele with research editing to improve and perfect all kinds of academic manuscripts for successful publication. Many of the carefully trained members of our manuscript editing and proofreading team work predominantly on articles intended for publication in scholarly journals, applying painstaking journal editing standards to ensure that the references and formatting used in each paper are in conformity with the journal’s instructions for authors and to correct any grammar, spelling, punctuation or simple typing errors. In this way, we enable our clients to report their research in the clear and accurate ways required to impress acquisitions proofreaders and achieve publication.

Our scientific proofreading services for the authors of a wide variety of scientific journal papers are especially popular, but we also offer manuscript proofreading services and have the experience and expertise to proofread and edit manuscripts in all scholarly disciplines, as well as beyond them. We have team members who specialise in medical proofreading services, and some of our experts dedicate their time exclusively to dissertation proofreading and manuscript proofreading, offering academics the opportunity to improve their use of formatting and language through the most exacting PhD thesis editing and journal article proofreading practices. Whether you are preparing a conference paper for presentation, polishing a progress report to share with colleagues, or facing the daunting task of editing and perfecting any kind of scholarly document for publication, a qualified member of our professional team can provide invaluable assistance and give you greater confidence in your written work.

If you are in the process of preparing an article for an academic or scientific journal, or planning one for the near future, you may well be interested in a new book, Guide to Journal Publication, which is available on our Tips and Advice on Publishing Research in Journals website.



更多文章