Summary
Discovering previously published research that overlaps with your thesis or dissertation topic can be unsettling, but it is not a reason to abandon your study. Overlap is normal in academic fields, and similar work can often strengthen your project rather than undermine it.
This article explains how to manage overlapping sources strategically. It discusses how to analyse similarities and differences, how to revise your focus or methods when needed, how to position your contribution clearly and how to incorporate overlapping research into your literature review and broader argument. It also highlights when to seek supervisor guidance.
With careful reading, critical reflection and transparent explanation, overlapping sources can sharpen your research questions, refine your methodology and help clarify your original contribution.
📖 Full Length Article (Click to collapse)
Managing Overlapping Research Sources in Academic Theses and Dissertations
Encountering previously published work that overlaps closely with your research intentions is a familiar moment in the life of a postgraduate researcher. You might feel discouraged, alarmed or even threatened when you come across a thesis, article or book that appears to “do the same thing” you planned. This reaction is natural—but it is rarely justified. Academic research is inherently cumulative, and overlapping topics are a sign that you are working in a meaningful, active field.
Instead of viewing overlapping sources as a setback, approach them as an opportunity to refine your argument, clarify your originality and strengthen your thesis or dissertation. This article explains how to interpret, analyse and incorporate overlapping studies into your work without losing confidence or momentum.
1. Understanding Why Overlap Happens
Academic fields often develop along shared lines of inquiry. Scholars working independently may ask similar questions because they are responding to the same historical events, theoretical debates or methodological innovations. When you discover that someone else has written on your topic, it rarely means your idea lacks originality. More often, it means your idea is timely.
Overlap becomes problematic only when a study reproduces your aims, methods and conclusions so precisely that your own project seems redundant. However, this is extremely rare. Even when two studies appear similar at first glance, careful reading usually reveals significant differences in:
- research questions or hypotheses,
- theoretical perspectives,
- methodological frameworks,
- data sources or case studies,
- interpretations and conclusions.
This is why the first step in managing overlap is to slow down and examine the source in detail before drawing conclusions.
2. Avoiding Panic: Why Overlap Is Not a Threat
When you encounter what seems like “your study already done,” your emotional response may overshadow your ability to assess the situation objectively. Before making drastic decisions, consider the following points:
- Overlapping does not mean identical. Two scholars almost never produce the same interpretations, even when using similar methods.
- Replication can be valuable. In science and social science, repeating or extending studies is often essential.
- You can reposition your study. A shift in focus, scope or methodology is often all that is needed.
- Overlap strengthens your literature review. It shows you are aware of major work in the field.
Many excellent theses and dissertations were once “overlapping projects” until their authors carefully reframed them.
3. Reading the Overlapping Source Critically
The title and abstract of a publication may give the impression that the study perfectly mirrors your own intentions. Do not stop there. Read the full text—slowly and critically. Take notes on the following:
- Scope — Does the study address the same population, time period or theoretical domain?
- Aims — What is the exact research question? Is it broader, narrower or simply different from yours?
- Methods — Is the methodology comparable or fundamentally distinct?
- Findings — Do the results overlap only partially, or do they challenge your assumptions?
- Limitations — What does the author say they did not address?
Often, what initially looks like a duplicate study turns out to be merely adjacent—related, but not directly overlapping. Even if it is close, differences will emerge when you read with attention.
4. Identifying Similarities and Differences
Once you have a full understanding of the overlapping source, create a comparison table showing points of similarity and difference. Consider grouping your notes into categories such as:
- Conceptual — Theories, definitions, frameworks.
- Methodological — Research design, instruments, sampling.
- Analytical — Statistical techniques, textual approaches, coding strategies.
- Contextual — Data sets, periods, regions, historical conditions.
- Interpretive — How the author explains results or phenomena.
This analysis will highlight where your originality lies—and where further adjustments might strengthen your project.
5. Deciding Whether You Need to Adjust Your Research Design
Some overlapping sources require only careful explanation. Others may signal the need for a more substantial modification to your project. Consider adjusting your approach if:
- the existing study answers your exact research question,
- the methods you planned accidentally replicate theirs too closely,
- your intended contribution is no longer distinctive or necessary.
Possible adjustments include:
- refocusing your research question;
- shifting the methodology or case study;
- extending, challenging or refining the overlapping study’s findings;
- adding a comparative dimension;
- studying a different population or time period.
Your supervisor can help you evaluate which adjustments are most appropriate. Overlap is part of academic life; supervisors know how to navigate it.
6. Incorporating the Overlapping Source into Your Dissertation
Overlapping sources should never be ignored. Instead, they should be discussed transparently and strategically in your dissertation. Suitable places to incorporate this discussion include:
- The literature review — Explain how the study relates to your research and where your work diverges.
- Methodology chapter — If methods are similar or contrasting, clarify why your approach is justified.
- Discussion chapter — Compare your findings with those of the overlapping study.
Your goal is to show that your study contributes something new—by addressing a gap, offering a new interpretation or applying a method differently.
7. Discussing the Overlap with Your Supervisor
If you are unsure how to interpret the overlapping source or whether the similarity threatens your project, discuss it with your supervisor. They can help you identify:
- how much the studies truly overlap,
- whether the new source strengthens or challenges your design,
- whether minor or major adjustments are advisable.
Supervisors expect students to encounter overlapping research. Bringing it to their attention early demonstrates responsibility and academic maturity.
8. Turning Overlap into Opportunity
Overlapping sources, far from being obstacles, can help you:
- define your study with greater precision,
- strengthen your methodology,
- refine your argument,
- develop a more compelling literature review,
- position your project within an active research conversation.
Your engagement with overlapping work—critical, thoughtful and honest—demonstrates intellectual maturity. Your ability to differentiate your study shows innovation. Many influential dissertations and journal articles build directly on earlier work while producing something more nuanced, expansive or original.
9. Practical Steps for Managing Overlapping Sources
To manage overlap efficiently, follow this practical sequence:
- Record the source immediately. Add it to your reference manager with notes.
- Read beyond the abstract. Do not judge overlap on the basis of summaries alone.
- Map similarities and differences. Use a structured table or thematic notes.
- Evaluate your research question. Does it need sharpening or reframing?
- Identify your contribution. What will your study add that the other does not?
- Discuss concerns with your supervisor. They can help assess impact.
- Plan how to incorporate the source. Decide where in the dissertation the explanation belongs.
This approach ensures that you remain in control of your research direction while using the overlapping study to your advantage.
10. Conclusion: Embrace Overlap as Part of Scholarly Growth
Discovering overlapping research can be unsettling, but it is also an important milestone in becoming a scholar. It shows that you are working in a vibrant field with active debates. It challenges you to think carefully about originality, precision and contribution. Most importantly, it provides an opportunity to refine your research design and produce a more robust thesis or dissertation.
Handled thoughtfully, overlapping sources can deepen your understanding, strengthen your argument and make your final submission more compelling. If you want assistance revising your literature review or clarifying your research gap, professional manuscript editing or journal article editing services may be helpful as you refine your academic contribution.
