Understanding APCs: The Real Cost of Publishing in Open Access Journals

Understanding Article Processing Charges (APCs) in Open Access Publishing

Open access (OA) publishing has transformed how scholarly knowledge is shared. Instead of restricting journal content to institutions that can afford expensive subscriptions, open access models aim to make research freely available to anyone with an internet connection. For readers, this is a tremendous step forward: students, academics, practitioners, policy-makers and members of the public can all consult up-to-date research without facing paywalls.

However, even when articles are free to read, publishing them is not free. Journals still need to manage submissions, coordinate peer review, edit and typeset manuscripts, maintain websites and digital archives, and ensure long-term access. In many open access models, these costs are covered through Article Processing Charges (APCs)—fees paid not by readers but by authors, their institutions or their funders. APCs enable open access, but they also raise important questions about affordability, fairness and sustainability.

This article explains what APCs are, what they pay for, why they vary so widely in price, and how they fit into different open access models. It also considers the advantages and drawbacks of APC-funded publishing and offers practical strategies to help researchers manage these charges responsibly.

What Are Article Processing Charges (APCs)?

Article Processing Charges (APCs) are fees that support the publication of an article in an open access journal. Instead of charging readers to access the final article, the journal charges a fee at the point of publication. In many cases, the invoice is issued only after the manuscript has been accepted following peer review, so the fee does not buy acceptance but funds the publication of accepted work.

Typical activities covered by APCs include:

• Editorial and peer review management – Operating the online submission system, assigning manuscripts to editors, inviting and reminding reviewers, managing revisions and communicating decisions.
• Copyediting and typesetting – Improving grammar, spelling and clarity where included in the journal’s service; formatting text, tables and figures; and preparing the article in PDF, HTML or XML formats.
• Digital hosting and archiving – Maintaining journal websites, ensuring search engine indexing, integrating with databases and repositories, and preserving content in long-term archives.
• Marketing and dissemination – Promoting articles through social media, email alerts, press releases and database partnerships to increase visibility and discoverability.
• Administrative and overhead costs – Supporting staff salaries, software licences, membership in publishing platforms and general business expenses.

In short, APCs allow journals to operate without relying on subscription revenue. They shift the financial burden from readers to authors and their supporters while keeping the published work open to the world.

Why Do Open Access Journals Charge APCs?

Traditional subscription-based journals earn revenue primarily from library and individual subscriptions. In fully open access models, this revenue stream largely disappears. APCs therefore become a replacement mechanism that allows journals to remain financially viable.

Key reasons why open access journals charge APCs include:

1. Editorial and peer review management – Although reviewers are usually unpaid volunteers, coordinating peer review requires substantial administrative work by editors and journal staff. APC income helps fund this labour and the systems that support it.
2. Digital infrastructure and archiving – Hosting and maintaining secure, stable websites, backing up data and ensuring integration with indexing services (such as PubMed, Web of Science or Scopus) all involve ongoing costs.
3. Production and quality control – Many journals invest in professional production to ensure that articles are well formatted, accessible across devices and compliant with bibliographic and metadata standards.
4. Marketing, visibility and compliance – Open access articles may be promoted more actively to reach a broad audience and to help authors comply with funder open access mandates.
5. Long-term sustainability – APCs are one way to support the journal’s continued operation without relying on unpredictable donations or short-term grants.

In principle, APCs are not simply a profit mechanism; they are intended to pay for the services that turn a manuscript into a permanent, citable contribution to the scholarly record.

How Much Do APCs Cost, and Why Do Fees Vary?

APCs span a wide range of price points. Some small or regional journals charge very modest fees; large international publishers may charge several thousand US dollars or more for a single article. Typical ranges include:

• Low-cost journals: approximately US$100–US$500 per article, often run by smaller publishers, societies or universities with limited overhead.
• Mid-tier journals: approximately US$500–US$2,000 per article, common among well-established publishers in many fields.
• High-impact or flagship journals: US$2,000–US$5,000 or more per article, especially for prestigious titles with high rejection rates and extensive editorial infrastructures.

Several factors influence APC pricing:

• Publisher scale and business model – Large commercial publishers may operate on higher cost structures and target profit margins, while society or university presses may focus more on cost-recovery.
• Journal reputation and impact – High-impact journals with selective acceptance criteria may justify higher charges by citing editorial workload and perceived prestige.
• Disciplinary norms – APC expectations vary across disciplines; some fields are accustomed to high fees, while others emphasise low-cost or no-fee models.
• Currency and regional cost differences – Operating costs, exchange rates and funding landscapes differ significantly between countries and regions.

Many publishers now offer waivers and discounts for authors from low- and middle-income countries or from institutions with limited resources. The terms of such schemes, however, vary widely and may not cover all authors who need support.

Who Actually Pays APCs?

Although APCs are often presented as fees paid by authors, in practice the funds come from several possible sources. Understanding these sources can help researchers plan how to cover costs long before they submit a manuscript.

1. University and institutional funds – Many universities operate dedicated open access funds or include APC support within library budgets. These funds may have eligibility criteria (such as only covering fully open access journals) and annual spending caps.
2. Research grants – Funding bodies increasingly allow APCs to be included as eligible expenses within project budgets. In some cases, paying for open access is a condition of the grant, making APCs a planned, legitimate cost.
3. Publisher waivers and discounts – Journals may offer partial or full fee waivers to authors who demonstrate financial need or who are based in certain countries or institutions.
4. Professional societies – Society membership sometimes includes discounted APCs or fee coverage for articles published in society journals.
5. Personal funds – When other options are unavailable, authors may pay APCs from personal resources, though this is often difficult or undesirable and raises equity concerns.

Because funding mechanisms and policies differ across institutions and disciplines, it is wise for authors to investigate APC support early in the research process—ideally at the grant-writing stage.

APCs Across Different Open Access Models

Open access is not a single model but a collection of approaches that use different funding structures. APCs play contrasting roles in each:

Gold Open Access (Full OA)

• Articles are freely available immediately upon publication.
• Journals typically rely on APCs as their main income source.
• Examples include many titles from PLOS, BioMed Central and MDPI, as well as fully open access journals from large commercial publishers.

Gold OA journals are often the most visible form of open access because every article they publish is immediately free to read.

Hybrid Open Access

• Subscription-based journals offer authors the option to pay an APC to make individual articles open access.
• Readers without subscriptions can access only those specific open access articles; the rest of the content remains behind paywalls.
• Major publishers (such as Elsevier, Springer Nature and Wiley) operate many hybrid journals.

Hybrid OA has attracted criticism because libraries may pay subscription fees while authors pay APCs, a situation often described as “double dipping.” However, hybrid journals can provide a pathway to open access when suitable fully OA journals are not available in a particular niche.

Diamond (or Platinum) Open Access

• Articles are freely available to readers, and authors do not pay APCs.
• Costs are covered by institutions, societies, consortia, governments or philanthropic organisations.
• Many university-based journals and some society journals follow this model.

Diamond OA is attractive from an equity perspective because it removes financial barriers for both readers and authors. However, it depends on stable institutional or public funding.

Green Open Access (Self-Archiving)

• Authors publish in traditional or hybrid journals but also deposit a version of their article—usually a preprint or accepted manuscript—in an institutional or subject repository.
• No APCs are required for self-archiving, but embargo periods and licensing conditions may apply.
• Examples of repositories include arXiv, PubMed Central and institutional archives operated by universities.

Green OA is an important avenue for researchers who cannot access APC funding but still want their work to be readable beyond paywalls, provided publisher policies allow it.

Advantages of APC-Funded Open Access

Despite their cost, APCs offer several clear benefits for authors, readers and the wider academic community:

1. Increased visibility and citations – Open access articles are generally more accessible, which can lead to higher readership and, in many cases, increased citation rates.
2. Global accessibility – Researchers, students and practitioners in low-income regions or at under-resourced institutions can access research without needing a subscription.
3. Faster dissemination – Many open access journals prioritise rapid peer review and online publication, allowing findings to reach the community sooner.
4. Compliance with funder mandates – Many funding agencies require or strongly encourage that results be made openly accessible, and APC-funded journals provide a straightforward route to compliance.
5. Public engagement and transparency – Open access supports public understanding of science and enables professionals outside of academia to make use of current research in policy and practice.

When APCs are well justified and fairly managed, they can be seen as an investment in the visibility and impact of research outputs.

Challenges and Criticisms of APCs

At the same time, APC-funded publishing is not without problems and controversies.

Financial Barriers and Equity Concerns

High APCs can exclude authors who lack institutional or grant support. Researchers in underfunded universities, early-career scholars and independent academics may struggle to afford publication fees. Even where waivers exist, the process for obtaining them can be unclear, competitive or unpredictable.

This can exacerbate existing inequalities in academic publishing. Institutions in wealthier countries are better positioned to pay APCs, potentially amplifying the visibility of research from already well-resourced regions and disciplines.

The Rise of Predatory Journals

The APC model has also been exploited by so-called predatory journals—outlets that charge fees but provide little or no genuine peer review or editorial oversight. These journals may aggressively solicit submissions, promise unrealistically fast publication and fail to uphold basic scholarly standards.

Publishing in predatory outlets can damage a researcher’s reputation, waste funding and obscure work in venues that are not taken seriously by the scholarly community. Authors must therefore evaluate journals carefully, checking editorial boards, indexing status, peer review policies and transparency regarding fees.

Pressure on Early-Career Researchers

Graduate students and early-career researchers may feel pressure to publish, but they often have limited control over APC funding. If supervisors, departments or funders do not provide support, early-career authors may be restricted in their choice of open access venues or may feel compelled to use personal funds, which is rarely sustainable.

Strategies for Managing APC Costs

Given these challenges, it is essential to approach APCs strategically. Researchers can take several practical steps to reduce or manage costs:

1. Plan APC funding early – When preparing grant applications or project budgets, include realistic estimates of APCs for anticipated publications.
2. Consult institutional resources – Talk to your library, research office or grants team about existing open access funds, publisher agreements or discount schemes.
3. Apply for waivers and discounts – Check journal websites for eligibility criteria, and be prepared to explain financial need or institutional limitations where appropriate.
4. Consider diamond OA and low-cost journals – No-fee or affordable open access journals may provide excellent visibility without imposing high APCs.
5. Use green open access where permitted – Depositing preprints or accepted manuscripts in repositories can offer open access without APCs, provided publisher policies are respected.
6. Evaluate value, not just price – A low APC is not automatically a good deal if the journal offers weak peer review or poor visibility; a higher APC may be justified when the journal provides genuine quality, indexing and long-term preservation.

Emerging Trends and the Future of APCs

The landscape of open access and APCs continues to evolve. Several important trends are shaping the future:

1. Transformative agreements – Many universities and consortia are negotiating “transformative” or “read and publish” deals with large publishers. These agreements bundle subscription access and APC coverage, allowing affiliated authors to publish open access without paying individual invoices.
2. Greater transparency around pricing – Scholars, libraries and funders are calling for clearer justifications of APC levels and more open reporting of publishing costs to prevent excessive or unjustified fees.
3. Policy initiatives and funder mandates – Initiatives such as Plan S in Europe require publicly funded research to be made openly accessible, often with strong preferences for compliant journals and repositories. These policies are encouraging new funding mechanisms and infrastructure for open access.
4. Growth of diamond open access – As concerns about affordability and equity increase, there is growing interest in expanding no-fee models supported by institutions, governments and non-profit organisations.

How APCs will evolve in the long term remains an open question, but it is clear that the conversation is moving beyond a simple “author pays” model toward more nuanced, collective funding approaches.

Conclusion

Article Processing Charges (APCs) are a central feature of many open access publishing models. They fund the editorial, technical and administrative work needed to publish scholarly articles and make them freely available to readers worldwide. At the same time, APCs can create financial barriers for researchers, contribute to inequities between institutions and regions, and be misused by low-quality or predatory journals.

For authors, navigating APCs effectively requires awareness, planning and critical evaluation of journals and funding options. By exploring institutional support, including APCs in grant budgets, applying for waivers where appropriate and considering diamond or green open access routes, researchers can broaden access to their work while managing costs responsibly.

As open access continues to expand, the academic community faces the ongoing challenge of balancing sustainability, affordability and fairness. Thoughtful use of APCs—alongside evolving alternatives—can help ensure that high-quality research remains widely accessible, without imposing unreasonable burdens on the researchers who produce it.

Professional human proofreading can help you make the most of your investment in open access by ensuring that your manuscript is clear, accurate and compliant with journal requirements. At Proof-Reading-Service.com, our experienced editors support authors at every stage of the publication process, from initial submission to final acceptance.