How To Write Highlights for an Academic or Scientific Paper

How To Write Highlights for an Academic or Scientific Paper

In today’s fast-paced digital publishing environment, where researchers, reviewers, and readers often scan dozens of papers a week, highlights have become an invaluable addition to academic and scientific manuscripts. Originally popularised by Elsevier less than a decade ago, highlights are now a standard requirement for many journals across disciplines. These brief summaries allow readers to quickly grasp the essential findings and significance of a paper without reading the entire abstract or introduction. They improve a paper’s visibility, accessibility, and potential for citation—benefits that every scholar can appreciate.

Writing effective highlights is both an art and a science. The challenge lies in condensing complex research findings into a few short, clear, and engaging statements. This article explains what highlights are, why they matter, how journals expect them to be formatted, and how to craft them to maximise clarity, accuracy, and reader engagement.

1. What Are Highlights and Why Do They Matter?

Highlights are concise, standalone statements—usually presented as bullet points—that summarise the main findings or contributions of a research paper. They are not the same as abstracts. While an abstract provides a comprehensive summary of your entire study—including background, objectives, methodology, results, and conclusions—highlights focus narrowly on the core outcomes and implications.

The benefits of highlights are significant for both authors and readers:

• For readers: Highlights provide a quick, digestible overview of your research, helping readers decide whether to explore your paper in full.
• For authors: Highlights increase your paper’s discoverability in databases, online searches, and social media platforms. Journals often display them prominently in tables of contents and mobile apps, leading to higher readership and potentially more citations.
• For journals: Highlights enhance accessibility and engagement, aligning with the global shift toward open science and digital dissemination.

In short, well-written highlights act as the “elevator pitch” of your research—brief yet persuasive, concise yet comprehensive.

2. Typical Journal Requirements

Although the concept of highlights is now widespread, specific requirements vary across journals. Some publishers request a short bulleted list of key phrases, while others require a more descriptive paragraph. For example, Elsevier’s guidelines—often considered the standard—ask for three to five bullet points summarising the key findings of a paper, with each point limited to 85 characters (including spaces).

These bullet points should capture the essence of your work without including background information, detailed methods, or long explanations. The goal is to present what is novel, important, and actionable about your research. If your target journal does not provide explicit guidance, reviewing recently published papers in that journal will reveal its preferences in terms of format and tone.

Some journals only request highlights after the manuscript is accepted for publication, while others require them during submission. Always verify the timeline and format expectations early to avoid last-minute revisions.

3. Planning and Timing: When to Write Your Highlights

Many authors make the mistake of drafting highlights too early, before the paper’s arguments and conclusions have been fully refined. It’s best to write highlights after completing the manuscript. By this stage, your research narrative will be clear, your findings defined, and your conclusions sharpened. You will also have a better sense of which results are most impactful or original.

That said, thinking about highlights throughout the writing process can be useful. Knowing that you’ll need to distil your research into three or four key statements encourages you to maintain focus and coherence in your paper.

4. Structure and Content: What to Include

Effective highlights should communicate the core contributions of your paper clearly and succinctly. A good structure to follow might include:

1. Context or purpose: A short statement that introduces the focus of your research or its broader importance.
2. Main findings: A sentence summarising the key results or discoveries.
3. Novelty: A highlight that underscores what is new, innovative, or different about your work compared to previous studies.
4. Applications or implications: A point indicating the relevance or potential impact of your findings.

For example:

• New catalyst developed for low-temperature hydrogen production.
• Findings reveal previously unknown protein interactions in plant immunity.
• Novel data model improves accuracy of climate forecasting by 25%.
• Results support policy changes for sustainable energy implementation.

Notice that each statement is brief, active, and self-contained. Together, they offer a snapshot of the research without requiring context from the full paper.

5. Writing Style: How to Be Concise and Compelling

Since highlights often have strict character limits, writing them requires precision. Follow these strategies to make every word count:

• Use the active voice: “The study identifies…” is clearer and more direct than “It was identified that…”
• Eliminate filler words: Remove unnecessary qualifiers such as “very,” “significantly,” or “in this study.”
• Replace long words with shorter synonyms: Use “use” instead of “utilise,” or “shows” instead of “demonstrates.”
• Focus on results and contributions: Avoid explaining methods, background, or theory.
• Avoid jargon: Use clear, accessible language that readers from adjacent disciplines can understand.
• Be accurate: Do not overstate your findings. Avoid phrases that imply certainty beyond your data, such as “proves” or “establishes.”

Remember that highlights are often read by non-specialists, journalists, and policymakers as well as academic peers. Clarity and accessibility are key to broadening your research’s reach.

6. Common Pitfalls to Avoid

While concise writing is essential, overly simplistic or exaggerated highlights can misrepresent your research. Be mindful of the following pitfalls:

• Oversimplification: Avoid stripping away nuance to the point that your findings become misleading.
• Repetition: Each bullet point should convey a distinct idea; avoid repeating the same result in different words.
• Unclear terminology: Abbreviations and acronyms may confuse readers if not defined clearly.
• Neglecting structure: Randomly listed highlights may seem disorganised; follow a logical progression from problem to solution.
• Grammatical errors: Since highlights are often displayed prominently, typos or grammatical mistakes can undermine credibility.

Always proofread your highlights carefully, ideally asking a colleague to review them for clarity and accuracy.

7. Adapting to Different Audiences and Journals

Some journals specify whether highlights should target specialist or general readers. For interdisciplinary or high-impact journals, aim for broader accessibility. For niche publications, using field-specific terminology may be appropriate. Always consult the journal’s author guidelines for explicit instructions.

In addition, journals may differ in their presentation formats:

• Bullet points: The most common format—short, separate sentences focused on key findings.
• Paragraphs: Some journals require a short summary paragraph (50–150 words).
• Graphical highlights: Increasingly, publishers encourage visual representations, such as summary figures or infographics, to accompany written highlights.

When in doubt, emulate the structure of highlights from recently published articles in your target journal. This ensures your submission aligns with editorial expectations.

8. Practical Steps for Writing Strong Highlights

1. Identify the core findings: Review your results and conclusions to determine the three to five points that truly define your paper’s contribution.
2. Draft long, then shorten: Begin with full sentences or paragraphs summarising your findings, then refine them to meet character limits.
3. Use keywords strategically: Include essential terms that readers are likely to search for, but avoid excessive keyword stuffing.
4. Review for coherence: Ensure each highlight relates logically to the others and collectively tells a clear story.
5. Revise for rhythm and flow: Read your highlights aloud. They should sound natural, not mechanical or abrupt.

Writing highlights is a distillation process—it forces you to see your work through the eyes of your readers. Done well, it clarifies your message and strengthens the overall presentation of your research.

9. Using Highlights to Improve Your Paper

Interestingly, writing highlights can also make your paper itself better. When you are forced to condense your study into a few key statements, you naturally identify which results are most important and whether your manuscript reflects those priorities clearly. Many authors find themselves revising their discussion or conclusion after drafting highlights to align the paper’s focus with its most impactful contributions.

This reflective process can enhance coherence, strengthen arguments, and sharpen the overall narrative of your study. In this sense, highlights are not merely an add-on for publication—they are a valuable self-editing exercise that can elevate the quality of your research writing.

10. Examples of Effective Highlights

Below are examples demonstrating the difference between weak and effective highlights:

Weak Highlights:

• We did a study on air pollution.
• Data were collected from many cities.
• The results are useful for future research.

Improved Highlights:

• Study identifies key urban pollution sources across 20 global cities.
• New model predicts air quality with 90% accuracy using satellite data.
• Findings provide evidence for revising international emission standards.

The difference lies in specificity, clarity, and action-oriented language. Effective highlights communicate what was discovered, how it was done, and why it matters.

11. Revising and Editing Highlights for Perfection

After drafting, review your highlights with the same attention you devote to your abstract or title. Ensure that each statement is grammatically correct, logically structured, and free of redundancy. Use the following checklist:

• Do the highlights accurately reflect the main results?
• Are they concise, within the required length?
• Do they use clear, accessible language?
• Do they engage potential readers by highlighting novelty and significance?
• Have they been proofread for errors in grammar, punctuation, or formatting?

For high-impact journals, consider asking a professional proofreader or editor with academic expertise to review your highlights. Small language refinements can make a significant difference in readability and professionalism.

12. Final Thoughts: Highlights as the Gateway to Your Research

Highlights may be short, but their importance should not be underestimated. In the digital age, they often serve as the first—and sometimes only—encounter a reader has with your work. When crafted thoughtfully, they invite engagement, enhance discoverability, and ensure your research stands out amid a flood of publications.

Think of your highlights as the gateway to your research: they should capture attention, convey impact, and accurately represent the excellence of the work that follows. By balancing brevity, precision, and clarity, you can create highlights that not only meet journal requirements but also elevate the visibility and influence of your scholarship.

---

At Proof-Reading-Service.com, our academic editors help authors refine every aspect of their manuscripts—from titles and abstracts to highlights. We ensure your writing communicates your research clearly, accurately, and persuasively, maximising your paper’s impact and appeal in top-tier journals.