Summary
Publishing research in academic or scientific journals requires a formal scholarly voice—clear, precise, authoritative and free from informal language. While modern digital platforms encourage conversational styles, publishers, peer reviewers and acquisition editors still expect traditional scholarly prose that demonstrates expertise and respect for disciplinary conventions.
This expanded guide explains why formal prose remains essential for successful publication, how informal elements such as contractions weaken academic authority, and why overusing specialist terminology can sound pretentious unless carefully defined. It also discusses how to develop an authentic scholarly voice by reading widely, refining vocabulary choices and learning from the strongest writers in your field.
Whether you are preparing a journal article, monograph chapter, research manuscript or conference submission, mastering formal academic style is a crucial step toward publication success. It not only helps communicate complex ideas clearly but also signals professionalism, credibility and readiness to contribute meaningfully to scholarly conversations.
📖 Full Length Article (Click to collapse)
How to Write Formal Scholarly Prose for Successful Research Publication
In today’s digital environment, academic and scientific ideas circulate in countless informal formats—blogs, social posts, personal websites, preprint comments and professional networking platforms. These spaces have opened new opportunities for researchers to share ideas quickly and conversationally. Informal prose can be approachable, lively and highly effective for public engagement or early-stage dissemination.
However, when preparing a manuscript for publication in a reputable journal or academic press, the expectations shift dramatically. Formal scholarly prose remains essential. Publishers expect clarity, precision, theoretical sophistication and stylistic consistency. Informal expression that works well online can undermine your credibility when submitting to peer-reviewed venues.
Understanding how to craft polished scholarly writing—and how to eliminate informal habits that slip easily into drafts—is therefore a crucial skill for any researcher hoping to publish successfully. This article explores what qualifies as formal scholarly prose, why it matters, which pitfalls writers must avoid and how you can strengthen your academic voice to meet publication standards.
1. Why Formal Scholarly Prose Still Matters
The rise of digital communication has not eliminated the value of traditional academic writing. In fact, formal prose is closely tied to scholarly authority. When evaluating manuscripts, journal editors look for writing that shows mastery of the field, a professional tone and respect for disciplinary conventions.
Formal prose:
• conveys expertise,
• helps readers trust your interpretations,
• signals that you understand academic norms,
• strengthens your argument through clarity and precision,
• avoids misunderstandings that may derail peer review.
Informality can be refreshing in early drafts, brainstorming or public-facing writing, but peer-reviewed environments demand a more rigorous style. Failure to demonstrate this professionalism is a common reason manuscripts are desk-rejected before reaching reviewers.
2. Contractions: A Subtle but Significant Informal Element
Contractions—such as “don’t,” “isn’t,” “we’re,” “I’ll” and “can’t”—are natural in speech and online communication, but they introduce a casual tone that publishers typically discourage. In formal research writing, contractions may suggest insufficient attention to style or an overly conversational voice.
The rule is simple: avoid contractions in any manuscript intended for publication, including:
• journal articles,
• book chapters,
• conference proceedings,
• grant proposals,
• research monographs.
The only exceptions are:
1. quotations that already contain contractions,
2. direct discussion of contractions as linguistic examples.
Because contractions slip into writing unnoticed, proofreading for them requires special care. Their presence is small but meaningful—a detail that signals whether a manuscript meets academic standards.
3. When Precision Matters More Than Prestige: Avoiding Pretentious Prose
Many authors worry that formal prose sounds stiff or pretentious. This misconception often arises from observing texts filled with complex terminology, dense jargon or unnecessarily elaborate phrasing. Yet well-written scholarly prose is not pretentious—it is precise.
Pretentious writing typically involves:
• using technical terms without explanation,
• inserting jargon unnecessarily,
• assuming readers understand specialised abbreviations,
• obscuring meaning behind overly complex sentences.
Rather than demonstrating expertise, this approach suggests insecurity or a lack of understanding. Scholars who genuinely master their field explain concepts with clarity, not obscurity.
4. How to Use Technical Terms Effectively
Academic writing frequently requires specialised language— theories, frameworks, statistical terms, experimental methods, historical concepts, philosophical distinctions. The key is not to avoid such terminology but to use it thoughtfully, precisely and with adequate explanation.
Best practices include:
• introduce technical terms the first time they appear,
• define unfamiliar abbreviations,
• use jargon only when it enhances clarity,
• avoid stacking multiple jargon-heavy phrases in one sentence,
• balance specialist vocabulary with readable syntax.
If a term is essential to your argument but rarely used outside a small subfield, take the time to contextualise it. Reviewers appreciate clear definitions—they help avoid misinterpretations and demonstrate mastery.
5. Reading Widely to Develop a Formal Scholarly Voice
One of the most effective ways to strengthen your academic writing is to read high-quality scholarship in your field. Formal scholarly prose cannot be mastered through rules alone; it is partly absorbed through repeated exposure.
When reading journal articles, monographs and conference papers:
• observe how authors structure arguments,
• pay attention to transitions, signposting and paragraph flow,
• notice how theoretical ideas are explained,
• study how evidence is integrated,
• examine the tone and sentence rhythm.
Over time, you begin to internalise the norms of your discipline: preferred vocabulary, common syntactic patterns, expected levels of detail and acceptable uses of abstraction or generalisation.
If you are fortunate, you may encounter writers whose style is both rigorous and inspiring. Their clarity, elegance and intellectual precision can serve as models for your own scholarly development.
6. Balancing Accessibility with Academic Rigour
Although scholarly prose must be formal, this does not mean it must be dull. The best academic writing is accessible and engaging while maintaining intellectual rigour. Achieving this balance requires attention to:
• sentence rhythm,
• varied structure,
• vivid verbs,
• thoughtful transitions,
• strategic emphasis,
• avoidance of unnecessary complexity.
You are not required to write in an artificially ornate tone to sound academic. Nor must you write in the dry, mechanical style that sometimes emerges from excessive caution. Instead, aim for clarity and precision in a voice that reflects your own academic identity.
7. Avoiding Informality in Scholarly Manuscripts
Informal language weakens the authority of your writing. Common informal elements include:
• conversational phrases (“a bunch of,” “kind of,” “pretty much”),
• cliché expressions,
• rhetorical questions lacking analytical purpose,
• direct address to the reader,
• humour unless contextually justified,
• imprecise filler words (“stuff,” “things,” “really”).
Some writers also inadvertently adopt the tone of social media or personal blogs—short, punchy sentences; emotional emphasis; or overly casual transitions. These stylistic choices undermine the careful, evidence-based tone required for academic publication.
8. Writing for a Broader Scholarly Audience
Your manuscript will not only be read by specialists in your subfield. It may be reviewed, edited and eventually cited by scholars from adjacent or interdisciplinary areas. Writing with formal precision ensures accessibility for readers whose expertise does not align perfectly with your own.
Consider the needs of:
• peer reviewers with varying methodological backgrounds,
• acquisition editors evaluating clarity and marketability,
• scholars from related fields,
• postgraduate students who may rely on your work,
• international researchers whose first language is not English.
Clear scholarly prose respects all these readers. It maximises your manuscript’s reach and scholarly impact.
9. Revising for Formality and Precision
Even the strongest writers must revise extensively. Formal prose rarely emerges in a first draft. Instead, it is built through multiple stages of refinement:
• replacing contractions,
• simplifying overloaded sentences,
• clarifying definitions,
• breaking long paragraphs into digestible ideas,
• ensuring consistent terminology,
• removing colloquial expressions,
• adjusting tone to match disciplinary norms.
Effective revision transforms a promising manuscript into publishable work. Working through several drafts ensures that the writing reflects your expertise in both content and communication.
10. Conclusion
Formal scholarly prose remains a cornerstone of successful academic publishing. While informal writing can have a valuable role in early drafts, public engagement or digital communication, it cannot replace the clarity, precision and authority required for peer-reviewed research. Developing a strong scholarly voice takes time, practice and strategic refinement, but it significantly increases your chances of publication success.
If you want expert help polishing tone, clarity and academic style in your journal articles or research manuscripts, our journal article editing service and manuscript editing service can support you throughout the publication process.
