Summary
A strong methodology is essential for producing a publishable journal article, yet many researchers find it the most challenging section to write. A publishable methodology must clearly explain what was done, why it was done that way, how data were gathered and analysed, which instruments and participants were involved, and how validity, reliability and ethical standards were upheld.
This article provides a detailed guide covering journal-specific requirements, methodological justification, use of instruments, variables, study groups, ethics, replicability, limitations, and best writing practices. By following these principles—and ensuring meticulous editing and proofreading—researchers can craft a methodology that demonstrates rigor, transparency and credibility, increasing their chances of publication in peer-reviewed journals.
📖 Full Length Article (Click to collapse)
How To Write a Methodology for a Publishable Journal Article
The methodology section of a journal article often appears straightforward, yet it is one of the most conceptually difficult parts to write well. It must provide a complete, transparent account of how the study was designed and conducted, while remaining concise, logical and strictly relevant to the research objectives. A well-prepared methodology not only explains what was done but also justifies why the chosen procedures were appropriate, how potential problems were controlled and how the research meets the standards expected by peer-reviewed journals.
This expanded guide (approximately 1500 words) outlines best practices for designing, structuring and writing a rigorous methodology section that meets the expectations of scholarly publishers and supports successful journal submission.
1. Follow Journal-Specific Instructions
No two journals present their methodology requirements in exactly the same way. Some request a standalone “Methods” section; others integrate methodology into broader headings such as “Materials and Methods,” “Research Design,” or “Experimental Procedures.” Subsection labels, word limits, structure and even the level of detail required vary widely among publishers.
Before writing, read the journal’s Instructions for Authors carefully. Confirm requirements relating to:
- section headings and subheadings;
- order and placement of content;
- whether supplementary materials should include extended methods;
- ethical statements or declarations;
- reporting standards (e.g., CONSORT, PRISMA, COREQ, STROBE).
Articles are frequently rejected before peer review for failing to follow basic structural requirements. Compliance with journal expectations is therefore an essential starting point.
2. Describe What You Did—Clearly and Completely
The primary purpose of the methodology section is to explain exactly what you did during the research process. This includes the design, the materials or subjects studied, data collection processes, procedures followed, and analytical methods used. The description must be detailed enough for another expert to understand and evaluate the methods’ appropriateness.
A strong methodology should answer the following questions:
- What was the research design (experimental, qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, longitudinal, archival, etc.)?
- What were the settings, conditions or environments in which research was conducted?
- How were data generated, measured, recorded or obtained?
- What were the exact procedures and steps taken from start to finish?
Chronological or logical sequencing is crucial. Present steps in the order they occurred, avoiding omissions that create ambiguity or gaps.
3. Provide a Rationale for Your Choices
Editors and reviewers expect clear explanations of why each method or procedure was chosen. Simply describing methods without justification is insufficient. Offer explicit reasoning by linking choices to your research questions, hypotheses or theoretical framework.
Examples of methodological justification include:
- explaining why a mixed-methods approach was preferable to a single-method design;
- justifying sampling strategies based on study objectives;
- clarifying the relevance of selected instruments to specific variables;
- demonstrating that the procedures align with accepted standards in your discipline.
4. Situate Your Methods in the Research Literature
Where appropriate, connect your methodology to existing studies. This helps readers understand the scholarly context and demonstrates that your approach has precedents in the literature.
For example:
- If you used an established method, cite foundational studies or validated protocols.
- If you modified a method, detail the modification and justify why it was necessary.
- If your method is novel, describe its development process and provide a rationale supported by existing theory or prior work.
5. Describe Instruments and Materials Carefully
Common instruments may only require identification, but custom-built or adapted instruments must be described in detail. Indicate how instruments were calibrated, administered or interpreted. Include diagrams or supplementary figures if necessary.
6. Identify and Explain Study Subjects or Samples
The methodology must specify what or who was studied. Whether your research involved human participants, laboratory animals, chemical compounds, archival documents or digital datasets, describe them fully and justify their selection.
- Describe sample size, recruitment procedures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Explain any grouping, categorisation or stratification of subjects.
- Clarify how sampling supports validity of results.
7. Define Variables and Controls
Research involving variables requires explicit definitions. Distinguish between:
- Independent variables (manipulated or controlled factors);
- Dependent variables (observed or measured outcomes);
- Confounding variables and how they were managed or minimised.
8. Explain Ethical Approval and Permissions
If your research required ethical approval or informed consent, explicitly state:
- the name of the ethics committee;
- the approval number or reference;
- whether informed consent was obtained;
- any additional permissions, such as access to restricted archives or use of proprietary materials.
9. Ensure Replicability and Reliability
A publishable methodology must enable experts to assess the study’s reliability and replicability. Provide enough detail to allow reproduction of the key procedures. Discuss limitations honestly, including:
- constraints that affected data collection or analysis;
- potential sources of bias;
- steps taken to mitigate errors.
10. Write Clearly, Concisely and in Past Tense
Methodologies must be written in clear, precise language. Remove unnecessary words, use past tense, and avoid ambiguity. Technical terms should be correct and consistent.
11. Proofread and Revise Thoroughly
The methodology must be reviewed as rigorously as the analysis and discussion. Check for logical sequencing, remove inconsistencies and ensure that all procedures align with the journal’s expectations. Professional academic proofreading—such as the services offered by Proof-Reading-Service.com—can help ensure clarity, accuracy and compliance.
