How To Publish Research Presentations in Formal and Informal Ways

How To Publish Research Presentations in Formal and Informal Ways

Presenting original research at conferences, symposiums, workshops and similar events is one of the most energising aspects of academic and scientific work. Conferences offer opportunities to test ideas, meet collaborators, refine methods and discover emerging trends long before they appear in print. For many researchers, an inspiring question after a talk or a conversation over coffee has been enough to unlock a difficult problem or suggest an entirely new direction for a project.

Yet there is a fundamental limitation to conference presentations: they are primarily spoken, ephemeral and often visible only to those who happened to attend a particular session in a particular room on a particular day. A presentation listed on a CV signals activity and expertise, but committees that make hiring, promotion or funding decisions typically place far more weight on written outputs that are formally published, indexed and citable.

For this reason, it is almost always advisable to treat each research presentation not as a final destination but as one step towards more permanent forms of dissemination. The question is not whether to publish, but how: conference proceedings, edited collections, journal articles, monographs, university repositories, personal websites, blogs and professional media platforms all offer different advantages and constraints. Understanding these options, and the associated editorial and ethical considerations, allows researchers to plan a publishing strategy that suits their project, discipline and career stage.

From Podium to Page: Why Publishing Presentations Matters

Conference presentations and formal publications serve different but complementary roles in the research ecosystem. A live presentation:

• offers rapid dissemination of work in progress,
• invites immediate questions and feedback,
• helps test how arguments and visuals land with an expert audience, and
• builds visibility within a scholarly community.

Formal and semi-formal publications, by contrast:

• provide a stable, citable record of the research,
• reach readers who did not attend the conference,
• are indexed and searchable in databases and catalogues, and
• carry greater weight in evaluation exercises, grant applications and promotion dossiers.

Because these functions are complementary, the most effective strategy is to integrate them. A presentation can be used to test the structure and clarity of a future article; questions raised by the audience can inform revisions; and feedback can highlight gaps in the literature review, methods or explanation that should be addressed in the written version. In ideal circumstances, the journey from abstract to talk to paper is planned from the outset.

Informal Conference Records

Many conferences now generate some form of internal record. Common examples include:

• PDFs of slides or extended abstracts collected by the organisers,
• audio or video recordings of sessions,
• online conference platforms where participants can download materials, and
• printed or electronic programmes listing titles, authors and abstracts.

These records are sometimes colloquially referred to as “proceedings,” but in many cases they are intended only for conference participants and are not treated as formal publications. They may be stored on a password-protected platform, distributed on a USB stick to attendees, or made available for purchase on CD or DVD. Access may be temporary, and indexing is rare.

Although these informal records can extend the reach of a presentation slightly, they have limitations:

• They are not usually peer reviewed in the formal sense.
• They may be difficult for non-attendees to obtain or cite.
• They can complicate later journal submissions if the content is publicly accessible online and appears to constitute prior publication.

For these reasons, it is important to clarify the status of any “conference proceedings” or online platforms associated with the event. If material will be open to the public, check whether journals in your field view such dissemination as a barrier to later publication, and adjust your presentation materials if needed (for example, by keeping detailed data for the journal article rather than the uploaded slides).

Formal Conference Proceedings

In many scientific and technical fields, formal conference proceedings remain a core publishing outlet. Proceedings may appear as:

• a printed or electronic volume produced by the conference organisers,
• a special issue of an established journal, or
• a series of volumes published by a scholarly society or academic press.

In the most robust models, papers are peer reviewed and copyedited in ways similar to journal articles. In others, the review process is lighter or focuses mainly on technical correctness and format. Some proceedings include full papers for all presentations; others publish only a selection, with the rest represented by abstracts. A small number contain abstracts only.

When considering whether to publish in conference proceedings, it is worth asking several questions:

• Scope and reputation: Is the conference well regarded in your field? Are its proceedings cited and respected?
• Editorial standards: Are submissions peer reviewed? Is there professional copyediting or typesetting?
• Visibility and indexing: Will the volume be indexed in major databases such as Web of Science, Scopus or discipline-specific indexes?
• Access model: Will the proceedings be open access, behind a paywall or distributed only to attendees?
• Impact on later publication: Do journals in your field accept substantially revised versions of work first published in proceedings, or do they regard this as prior publication?

Conference organisers often announce their intentions regarding proceedings in the call for papers or in acceptance letters. If details are unclear, it is wise to ask specific questions before committing. In some cases, opting out may not be possible once a presentation has been accepted, so clarity at an early stage is important.

When a decision is made to contribute to proceedings, authors are usually asked to submit a “publishable version” of their presentation. This may involve:

• expanding bullet points into full prose,
• reformatting figures and tables to meet guidelines,
• adding citations and a complete reference list, and
• incorporating feedback received during the conference.

Treat the proceedings paper as a genuine publication rather than a lightly polished script. Invest in structure, clarity and accuracy; readers may encounter this paper long after the details of the live presentation have faded.

Independent Edited Collections

Another formal route for conference presentations is the edited collection—a book of chapters that address a common theme, problem, method or corpus. Sometimes these collections arise directly from conferences, with organisers inviting contributors to rework their presentations into chapters. In other cases, the connection to the conference is looser: an author may submit a chapter based on a presentation to a thematic volume that includes work from multiple sources.

Publishing a presentation as a book chapter involves distinctive considerations:

• Originality and prior dissemination: Many book editors and presses require that chapters have not been published elsewhere in similar form. A previously published conference paper may therefore need substantial rethinking, or it may not be eligible at all.
• Fit with the collection: Editors look for coherence across chapters. A presentation may need to be reframed to align with the collection’s conceptual structure or target readership.
• Length and depth: Book chapters are often longer than conference papers, allowing for more extensive literature reviews, fuller explanations of context and richer examples.
• Editorial process: Collections usually undergo peer review—either chapter-by-chapter or through review of the volume as a whole—followed by rounds of revision and copyediting.

Before committing to a collection, it is sensible to evaluate both the editors and the press. Consider the reputation of their previous books, the likely distribution channels, whether electronic versions will be available and how discoverable the material will be in library catalogues and online searches. For some fields, a well-placed book chapter can be as career-enhancing as a journal article; in others, journal publications may carry more weight.

Academic & Scientific Journals

For many researchers, publishing a research presentation as an article in a peer-reviewed journal is the preferred outcome. Journals remain the primary vehicles through which new findings are disseminated, evaluated and archived. Converting a presentation into a journal article, however, requires careful attention to both content and ethics.

First, journals typically expect novelty. If the paper has already been published—whether in proceedings, an institutional repository or a widely accessible online platform—the editor may consider it insufficiently original for journal publication. This does not mean that presenting at a conference is problematic; in fact, most journals explicitly allow prior oral presentation. However, when submitting the article, authors should:

• disclose the presentation history in the cover letter,
• explain whether any abstract or proceedings paper exists, and
• clarify how the submitted article extends, revises or deepens the conference version.

Secondly, a journal article usually demands more than a written-out script. It requires a full scholarly apparatus: a comprehensive literature review, a clearly described methodology, detailed results (or analyses, in qualitative and humanities fields), and a discussion that engages with existing scholarship and highlights implications for future research.

Practical steps when targeting a journal include:

• studying the journal’s aims and scope to ensure a good match,
• following the author guidelines meticulously (word limits, structure, reference style, figure requirements),
• revising the argument so it stands alone without the context provided orally, and
• ensuring that any data or images meet the journal’s standards for ethics and integrity.

It is also prudent to assess the journal’s standing. Questions to consider include:

• Is the journal indexed in relevant databases?
• Does it have a solid peer-review process and ethical policy?
• Is it open access, subscription-based or hybrid? Are publication fees involved?
• Has the journal ever been flagged as predatory or problematic in your field?

A well-chosen journal can greatly amplify the impact of research that first took shape as a 15-minute talk or a poster in a crowded conference hall.

Academic & Scientific Monographs

Occasionally, a conference presentation represents only a small window into a much larger, multi-year project. In such cases, the most appropriate long-term home for the research may be a monograph—a full-length academic or scientific book.

Turning a presentation into a monograph is a substantial undertaking. It often requires:

• additional data collection or archival research,
• expansion and deepening of theoretical and methodological chapters,
• integration of multiple related studies into a coherent narrative, and
• careful attention to structure, argument and readability across several hundred pages.

Monographs play different roles across disciplines. In many humanities fields, a first monograph remains a central milestone for early-career scholars. In the natural and medical sciences, the emphasis tends to be on articles rather than books, though multi-author volumes on specialised topics can still be important.

As with edited collections, choosing a publisher is crucial. University presses and reputable academic publishers typically provide robust peer review and editorial support, as well as strong distribution. By contrast, vanity or pay-to-publish presses may offer quick publication but limited quality control and poor visibility. It is worthwhile to:

• examine recent titles from potential presses,
• ask colleagues about their experiences, and
• consider whether electronic versions will be available through libraries and platforms used in your field.

Even when a monograph is the ultimate goal, intermediate publications—conference proceedings, journal articles or chapters—can play a valuable role in refining the arguments and establishing a track record.

University Websites & Institutional Repositories

Not every presentation needs to, or can, become a formal publication. Sometimes the research is highly applied, local in scope or best communicated in a visual or narrative format unsuited to traditional journals. In these cases, university websites and institutional repositories offer useful ways to make work accessible.

Repositories are designed to store and share scholarly outputs produced by staff and students. They can typically accommodate:

• PDF versions of slides or posters,
• full texts of presentations or working papers,
• videos or audio recordings of talks, and
• supplementary materials such as datasets or images.

Depositing a presentation in a repository ensures that:

• the work has a stable, citable URL (often with a DOI),
• search engines and academic discovery services can index it, and
• potential collaborators, students and practitioners can find and use it.

Before uploading, it is essential to:

• check copyright and licensing for any material reused from elsewhere (including figures from published articles),
• add in-text citations and a reference list if they were missing from the original talk, and
• ensure that sensitive data or confidential information are anonymised or removed.

While repository deposits may not count as formal publications, they demonstrate a commitment to open scholarship and can be positively viewed by evaluation panels—especially when linked to clear records of presentations and projects.

Personal Websites & Blogs

Many researchers maintain personal websites or blogs to showcase their work. These platforms offer flexibility in tone, format and frequency, making them ideal for sharing presentations in more accessible or experimental ways.

Possible approaches include:

• posting a summary of a conference presentation with key figures and a link to slides,
• writing a reflective piece on how audience feedback reshaped the project,
• breaking a complex talk into a short blog series aimed at non-specialists, or
• embedding a video of the presentation alongside a short written explanation.

To maximise the scholarly value of a personal site, it is wise to:

• maintain a professional tone and clear structure,
• separate personal content from research outputs or host them in clearly distinct sections,
• include full citations and links to formal publications where relevant, and
• ensure the site is technically accessible (mobile-friendly, clearly labelled headings, simple navigation).

Although websites and blogs are unlikely to be evaluated in the same way as peer-reviewed publications, they can significantly increase the visibility and impact of research presented at conferences, especially when aimed at practitioners, policymakers or the public.

Professional Media Platforms

Professional media platforms such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu and similar services have become popular places to share research presentations informally. These platforms allow users to:

• upload PDFs of slides, posters or full texts,
• link to videos hosted on other sites,
• track views and downloads, and
• connect with readers who request copies or wish to collaborate.

For presentations that are not yet ready for journal submission, or for outputs that will never take the form of traditional articles, such platforms can provide substantial visibility. They often appear prominently in search results and can bring work to the attention of researchers who missed the conference itself.

As with repositories and websites, it is important to respect copyright and licensing rules. Before uploading, verify that:

• no exclusive rights have been assigned to a proceedings publisher or journal,
• reused figures are properly cited and cleared for reposting, and
• sensitive or confidential content has been removed or anonymised.

Used thoughtfully, these platforms complement formal publication by extending the reach of research presentations and providing evidence of ongoing engagement and dissemination.

Planning a Coherent Dissemination Strategy

Given the range of options, how can researchers choose the most productive ways to publish their presentations? A few guiding principles can help:

• Begin with the end in mind. When drafting a conference abstract, consider what form the longer-term output might take: a journal article, a chapter, a protocol, a policy brief, a methods paper or a monograph chapter.
• Clarify priorities. If formal peer-reviewed publications are crucial for career progression, focus on journals, proceedings and books, using informal channels as supportive rather than primary outlets.
• Avoid self-plagiarism and duplication. Do not submit essentially the same paper to multiple outlets, and always disclose prior presentations or related publications.
• Think about audiences. Policymakers, practitioners and communities may be better reached by repository deposits, blogs and professional platforms than by highly technical journals.
• Keep records. Maintain a clear log of where and how each version of a presentation has been shared to simplify future submissions and permission requests.

By treating presentations as part of a wider dissemination plan rather than isolated events, researchers can ensure that their work achieves both immediate visibility and lasting impact.

---

At Proof-Reading-Service.com, our academic and scientific editors regularly help authors transform conference presentations into polished proceedings papers, journal articles, chapters and monographs. We can check structure, clarity, style and referencing to ensure that your written version meets the expectations of editors, reviewers and readers in your field.