Summary
Apostrophe use in English possessive forms often confuses academic writers, especially when deciding whether to add an apostrophe plus *s* or an apostrophe alone. Some nouns, particularly plural nouns ending in *s* and specific categories of singular names, require only an apostrophe, not an additional *s*.
This guide explains the grammatical logic behind apostrophe-only possessives, clarifies when pronunciation influences spelling, and examines how linguistic tradition affects classical names, place names and French nouns. Understanding these patterns helps writers avoid inconsistency and maintain clarity in formal scholarly prose.
Mastery of apostrophe usage strengthens academic writing and ensures documents align with style expectations in journals, theses and professional publications.
📖 Full Length Article (Click to collapse)
How to Form Apostrophe-Only Possessives Correctly in Academic Writing
In academic and scientific writing, precision in grammar is essential. Among the many conventions that writers must master, the formation of English possessive nouns frequently causes confusion—especially when deciding whether a possessive should be formed using an apostrophe alone or an apostrophe plus s. In a previous discussion, the rules for adding ’s to nouns were addressed. This article focuses on the equally important situations in which the possessive is formed with an apostrophe only, without the extra s.
These rules matter because possessive forms appear constantly in scholarly writing—when referring to authors’ theories, institutions’ policies, disciplines’ terminology, participants’ responses and decades’ historical contexts. Inconsistency or incorrect usage interrupts clarity, distracts readers and signals a lack of attention to academic conventions. By learning when to add only an apostrophe, writers can avoid such errors and produce polished prose.
1. Plural Nouns Ending in “s”
The most straightforward rule is that plural nouns already ending in s form their possessive by adding only an apostrophe. This applies to ordinary plural nouns such as “cats,” “participants,” “colleagues,” “variables” or “findings.”
Examples include:
• “the researchers’ interpretations” • “the participants’ scores” • “the students’ expectations”
Because the s is already present in the plural form, adding an additional s would create unnecessary visual clutter and awkward pronunciation.
2. Plural Proper Names Ending in “s”
Plural last names also follow the apostrophe-only rule. A family named the Taylors or the Fergussons forms the possessive as:
• “the Taylors’ house” • “the Fergussons’ business”
These forms indicate that the houses or businesses belong to the family as a group. Adding ’s would suggest a singular individual, thereby changing the meaning.
3. Plural Acronyms and Initialisms Ending in “s”
In academic contexts, writers often pluralize acronyms—for example, “PCs,” “NGOs,” “PhDs,” or field-specific abbreviations such as “KIs” (key informants). When forming the possessive of such plurals, only an apostrophe is added:
• “the KIs’ responses were analysed” • “the NGOs’ priorities were reviewed”
This maintains readability and aligns with standard grammar conventions.
4. Plural Years and Decades Ending in “s”
Decades formed as plurals end in s and therefore take only an apostrophe in the possessive:
• “the 1960s’ political movements” • “the 1970s’ fashion trends”
The apostrophe indicates possession by the entire decade, not by a singular element.
5. Singular Nouns Ending in an “s” Sound
Although less intuitive than plural forms, certain singular nouns ending in an s sound take an apostrophe only when adding ’s would create awkward or cumbersome pronunciation. This rule balances grammatical correctness with ease of reading and speaking.
• “the oasis’ trees” • “the species’ survival”
The choice reflects phonetic clarity: “oasis’s trees” is technically acceptable in some style guides but less elegant in academic prose.
6. Singular Proper Names Ending in an “s” Sound
Many proper names end with an s-sound—Nicholas, Demas, Achilles, Hortensius. The possessive of such names traditionally uses only an apostrophe if adding ’s would complicate pronunciation, especially when the name is long or the stress is not on the final syllables.
• “Nicholas’ article” • “Hortensius’ treatise”
Because academic writing values economy and clarity, the apostrophe-only form is generally preferred for longer classical or Latinate names.
7. Words Ending in “-iz” or “-eez” Sounds
Certain multi-syllable names ending with an “iz” or “eez” sound usually form the possessive with an apostrophe only:
• “Bridges’ theory” • “the Ganges’ banks”
The additional s would sound forced and disrupt the natural rhythm of the sentence.
8. French Singular Nouns Ending with a Silent “s”
French names and words adopted into English often end with a silent s. To avoid awkward or misleading forms, writers use only an apostrophe:
• “Descartes’ reasoning” • “the marquis’ inheritance”
Adding ’s here may mislead readers into pronouncing the silent s.
9. Classical Names Ending in “s” or “es”
Classical names have special conventions. Names such as Socrates, Hercules, Achilles and Dionysus traditionally take an apostrophe-only possessive:
• “Socrates’ dialogues” • “Dionysus’ rituals”
However, short classical names—Zeus, Mars, Iris—may add ’s:
• “Zeus’s influence” • “Mars’s orbit”
Scientific writing tends to prefer ’s even for classical names, especially in astronomy or biology. Thus, “Mars’s canals” and “Eros’s orbit” appear commonly in scientific contexts.
10. Expressions Ending in “sake”
Certain fixed expressions using sake follow the apostrophe-only rule:
• “for goodness’ sake” • “for Jesus’ sake” • “for conscience’ sake”
These forms have become standard; adding ’s would sound unnatural. In “for old times’ sake,” the noun is plural (“times”), so the apostrophe marks the plural possessive.
11. Plural-Form Names of Places and Organisations
Some place names or institutional names appear plural even though they refer to a single entity. Such names end with s and therefore take only an apostrophe:
• “the United States’ president” • “the Netherlands’ economy” • “the Centre for Medieval Studies’ programmes”
Using ’s in these cases would violate established convention and appear incorrect to readers familiar with formal writing.
12. Why Apostrophe Consistency Matters in Academic Writing
Apostrophe misuse is one of the most common errors encountered by editors and reviewers. These errors interrupt readability and can undermine the perceived professionalism of a manuscript. Because academic writing relies on precision, mastering apostrophe usage is essential for presenting research clearly and credibly.
Writers should therefore consult style guides (Chicago, APA, MLA) and apply their rules consistently. When in doubt, choose clarity and avoid unnecessary additions that complicate pronunciation or visual presentation. A consistent approach throughout a thesis, article or monograph strengthens the final document’s coherence.
Final Thoughts
Although apostrophe rules may appear minor, they contribute significantly to the clarity and professionalism of academic writing. Understanding when to use an apostrophe alone—especially with plural nouns, classical names, institutional titles and words ending in s-sounds—allows authors to avoid common mistakes and present sophisticated prose with confidence.
For authors who want specialist support ensuring correct grammar, academic tone and overall clarity, our journal article editing service and manuscript editing service can help refine your writing for publication.
