Summary
Online writing rewards freshness—but ethics and accuracy still rule. Make old ideas feel new by adding your evidence, angle, and audience value, while crediting other people’s words, original ideas, and creative assets with clear attribution. You can freely emulate layout conventions and widely known ideas, but you must acknowledge specific intellectual contributions and quotations, and respect licences for images, datasets, code, and media.
Practical playbook: (1) decide what needs attribution (verbatim text, distinctive ideas, figures, datasets, code, charts, unique phrasing); (2) choose a clear hyperlink-first citation style for the web and add full references where appropriate; (3) paraphrase responsibly (transform + credit), use short quotes sparingly with quotation marks; (4) check licences (CC BY, CC0, fair use limits, vendor terms) before reusing visuals or code; (5) avoid self-plagiarism by signalling reuse of your own previously published text and linking to it; (6) maintain a small audit trail of sources and permissions.
Bottom line: borrow formats and general topics without credit; acknowledge specific language, ideas, visuals, data, and code with explicit credit. Add a vantage point—examples, numbers, checklists—to make the web better than the page you just read.
📖 Full Length (Click to collapse)
Borrowing and Acknowledging in an Online Context: Plagiarism Advice for Scholars
On the open web, ideas move fast and repeat often. The craft of online scholarly writing is making the familiar newly useful—without crossing ethical lines. This guide clarifies what you may borrow freely, what you must acknowledge explicitly, and how to give credit cleanly in blogs, lab sites, LinkedIn articles, Substack posts, preprints, and project pages.
1) The Web’s Paradox: “Nothing New” vs. “Always New”
Search engines prefer freshness; readers prefer value. Much of what appears “new” online is repackaged insight, not new knowledge. Scholarly credibility rests on two pillars:
- Value-add: you contextualise, verify, visualise, or apply an idea to new data, a new audience, or a new decision.
- Attribution: you make it obvious when specific language, original ideas, or creative assets come from someone else.
Get those right and you can participate in the fast cycle of online conversation while honouring slow, careful research.
2) What Requires Acknowledgement Online?
Credit is about specificity. Ask, “Could a reasonable reader trace this exact language, claim, figure, or asset to a single source?” If yes, credit it. If no (it’s general knowledge), you may not need to.
| Borrowed item | Needs credit? | How to credit on the web |
|---|---|---|
| Verbatim text (any length) | Always | Quotation marks or blockquote + author/source name + hyperlink; add page/section if relevant |
| Distinctive idea/argument/model | Yes | Paraphrase in your words + “According to …” with link; add brief citation footnote if longform |
| Figures, charts, photos, diagrams | Yes (and licence) | Caption with creator, year, licence (e.g., CC BY 4.0), and link; ensure licence permits reuse |
| Data sets | Yes | Dataset title, creator, repository/DOI, version/date; describe transformations you performed |
| Code/snippets/notebooks | Yes | Respect the repo’s licence (MIT, GPL, Apache); include provenance and version/commit hash |
| General conventions (post structure, section order, headline format) | No | Freely emulate—like following IMRaD in a paper |
| General, widely-known ideas (“short formats are hard for complex results”) | No (usually) | Freely apply to your case; add a link to a strong explainer if helpful for readers |
3) How to Attribute Cleanly on the Web
3.1 Hyperlink-first citations
Online, clarity beats formality. The simplest approach is a named-link inside the sentence and, where needed, a short reference section at the end.
3.2 When you need more than a link
- For longform posts or cross-posted excerpts, add a compact reference list (APA/Chicago/Harvard—pick one and be consistent).
- For quotations, include a pinpoint locator: page, paragraph, figure, or timestamp for audio/video.
- For legal clarity, reproduce licence text where required (e.g., CC BY 4.0 attribution line).
3.3 Quoting vs paraphrasing
- Quote for a unique definition or turn of phrase; keep it short; use quotation marks; add a link.
- Paraphrase for ideas; change structure and wording substantially, integrate with your own voice, and still credit the source.
4) What You Can Borrow Without Attribution
4.1 Layouts, formats, and patterns
Borrow the skeleton: scannable headings, TL;DR summaries, methods/results/limitations sections, figure-first storytelling, FAQs, checklists. These are conventions, not creative works needing credit.
4.2 General topics and angles
Looking at successful posts to pick themes (writing for non-specialists, visualising effect sizes) is fine. Your value add is examples, numbers, comparisons, or a field-specific application.
5) Respecting Licences and “Fair Use” Online
Not everything on the web is free to reuse. Before you paste, check:
- Creative Commons (CC): CC BY requires attribution; CC BY-SA requires using the same licence; CC BY-NC restricts commercial use; CC0 is public domain.
- Stock vendors: licences restrict redistribution, modification, and logo use; do not repost “editorial use only” images outside allowed contexts.
- Journal figures: many are under publisher copyright even if the article is open access; use the journal’s permissions tool or link rather than reproduce.
- Datasets/code: cite the DOI and respect the repository’s terms; for GPL’d code, derivative distribution obligations may apply.
- “Fair use” (US)/“quotation right” (EU): limited, purpose-bound exceptions; transformative commentary with minimal amount; always add attribution; when in doubt, link instead of copy.
6) Special Cases for Scholars
6.1 Self-plagiarism (text recycling)
Reusing your own prose across venues without signalling can mislead readers and breach publisher terms. If you adapt prior text:
- Link to the original and add a note: “Adapted from our 2024 preprint.”
- Rewrite for the new audience; move overlapping methods/definitions to a sidebar; keep unique analysis fresh.
- Check journal policies before posting a near-duplicate on a lab blog or newsletter.
6.2 AI-assisted writing
If you use a language model to help draft or edit, you remain responsible for the truthfulness and originality of the content. Check for hallucinations, and follow your institution or journal’s disclosure policy (e.g., “The authors used [tool] for copy-editing; the authors take responsibility for all content”). Never “cite” a model as a source of facts.
6.3 Screenshots, embeds, and social media
- Embedding a tweet/video usually preserves attribution and may be licence-compliant; screenshots can be trickier—add credit and ensure your use is transformative (commentary/critique).
- Blur/redact personal data; respect platform terms and privacy laws.
7) Make the Old Fresh Again—Ethically
“Freshness” online isn’t novelty for novelty’s sake; it’s usefulness. Techniques:
- Translate across audiences: turn a technical result into “what this means for clinicians/teachers/policymakers.”
- Visualise differently: convert dense tables into margin-of-error plots; add uncertainty bands.
- Compare methods: replicate a published claim with your data; discuss where it holds or fails.
- Localise: apply a global idea to a local dataset, context, or language.
- Aggregate well: link out to the best 5 sources on a topic; summarise what each adds; don’t hoard—route readers to quality.
Before: “As Jones (2022) says, ‘Effect sizes should replace p-values,’” (no added value).
After: “Building on Jones (2022), we re-analyse two education trials and show how reporting Hedges’ g with 95% CIs changes the decision to scale (Fig. 1).”
8) A Simple Attribution Toolkit You Can Copy
9) Common Pitfalls (and Quick Fixes)
- Patchwriting: lightly rewording a paragraph without credit. → Paraphrase deeply and cite, or quote briefly with quotation marks.
- Attribution by URL dump: long naked links at the end. → Use named hyperlinks in-line; add a tidy references section if needed.
- Figure reuse without permission: copying from a paywalled journal. → Link to the figure, request permission, or redraw from the underlying data with attribution.
- Ambiguous “according to studies”: no traceable source. → Name the author(s) and hyperlink to the exact source.
- Invisible edits to CC images: changing colours, cropping logos. → Declare modifications in the credit line; respect NoDerivatives licences.
- Silent self-recycling: cross-posting the same text. → Add “Adapted from …” at the top; summarise and link instead of re-publishing in full when possible.
10) A 7-Step “Pre-Publish” Attribution Check
- Highlight borrowed bits: quotes, stats, figures, screenshots, datasets, code.
- Add credits: inline named links + captions with creator, year, licence, DOI/URL.
- Verify licences: CC terms, journal permissions, stock usage rules.
- Re-paraphrase: any patchwritten paragraphs; ensure your voice leads.
- Note self-reuse: add “Adapted from …” if you repurpose your own text.
- Keep a source log: a tiny note at the end of your draft with links/DOIs and permission emails.
- Final skim: can a reader tell what’s yours vs borrowed within 2–3 seconds? If not, make attribution more obvious.
11) Short Templates You Can Paste
“This article adapts and updates material from our 2023 preprint, ‘Title’ (link). Substantial revisions include new analyses (Sections 2–3) and updated figures.”
“Dear [Rights holder], May I reproduce Figure 2 from ‘[Title]’ in an online blog post for educational purposes? The post will credit you as creator, link to the original, and note any adaptations. The blog is non-commercial and open access.”
“Map by L. Andre (2024), CC BY 4.0. Modifications: simplified labels.”
12) FAQ
Q: How much of a source can I quote?
A: As little as needed to make your point. Short quotes with clear attribution are safer; prefer paraphrase + citation for longer passages. For images/figures, follow the licence or get permission.
Q: Do I have to cite widely known facts?
A: Not usually. But if a specific statistic, phrasing, or data point is distinctive or disputed, provide a source.
Q: Can I copy my own methods section to a blog?
A: You can adapt it, but signal the reuse and check publisher terms. Better: summarise in new words and link to the full paper.
Conclusion: Credibility Compounds
Good online scholarship is generous: it credits predecessors, links to the best sources, and adds something new. Emulate effective formats and common-sense ideas without apology; acknowledge others’ language, analyses, figures, datasets, and code with explicit, reader-friendly credits. Do that consistently and you’ll protect your reputation, ease future publication, and—most importantly—help readers learn faster.
Need a quick attribution audit before you publish? We can scan your draft, add clear credit lines and licences, and supply a tidy references section with DOIs and links.
