How To Respond When a Journal Editor Asks You To Do a Peer Review

How To Respond When a Journal Editor Asks You To Do a Peer Review | Tips on How to Get Your Research Published
You just received a request from the editor of a reputable scientific journal asking if you would be willing to review a paper submitted for publication. The request has taken you by surprise. You certainly were not expecting it, and although you have read peer reviews on your own writing, you have never done one before. How should you respond?

Well, as a sound beginning, try to override any emotional responses you may experience. You might feel flattered or even overjoyed by the request or you may feel somewhat frightened or intimidated by the thought of assessing another scholar’s writing. These are not reasons for accepting or declining the offer, however, and feeling a little nervous when you start to do peer reviews is far from unusual. In fact, it will help you focus on doing an excellent job.
Increase Your Chances of Getting Published
Time is a serious consideration, however, so if you think that you simply will not have the time to do the review thoroughly and well by the deadline indicated by the editor, you will need to decline the offer. Do give this some thought, however. If you decline this invitation, the editor may not ask you again, so it might be well worth making the time. Keep in mind that a high-quality review does take a considerable amount of time to complete and that dashing if off quickly is not acceptable. You need to be engaged and interested and willing to give the paper and the research it presents a close reading and thoughtful reflection. You will also need time to write a clear and helpful review for the editor and author. The time you invest will be well repaid by valuable experience, contributions to knowledge and benefits to your career, but if it truly is impossible, let the editor know right away and suggest, if you can, an alternate reviewer so that the publication process will be delayed as little as possible.

Perhaps the most important question is whether you are the right person to do the review. The editor seems to think so and the author may have recommended you as a possible reviewer, but the final decision is, of course, your own. You should only go ahead with the review if the article lies within the scope of your expertise so that you can effectively assess the research and offer an informed critical review. You need to be familiar with current research and previous publications in the area, and you also need to be free of any conflicts of interest in relation to the paper. In most cases the author’s name will be known to you, so if that author is your research partner (or nemesis) or your ex-wife, that would constitute a conflict of interest and be a valid reason for declining the invitation.

Unless you are already very familiar with the journal, it may be a good idea to learn a little more about it, its scope and aims and its peer review process. The editor may have provided some guidance along with the request, and most journals offer a great deal of information online. You will certainly need to educate yourself about the journal if you decide to do the review, but if you are uncertain whether to accept or decline, a little more information never hurts, and knowing what the aims are and what you are expected to do will certainly help you make a wise decision.

Why Our Editing and Proofreading Services?
At Proof-Reading-Service.com we offer the highest quality English editing and proofreading services via our large and extremely dedicated team of academic and scientific professionals. All of our proofreaders and editors are native speakers of English who have earned their own postgraduate degrees, and their areas of specialisation cover such a wide range of disciplines that we are able to help our international clientele with research editing to improve and perfect all kinds of academic manuscripts for successful publication. Many of the carefully trained members of our expert editing and proofreading team work predominantly on articles intended for publication in scholarly journals, applying painstaking journal editing standards to ensure that the references and formatting used in each paper are in conformity with the journal’s instructions for authors and to correct any grammar, spelling, punctuation or simple typing errors. In this way, we enable our clients to report their research in the clear and accurate ways required to impress acquisitions editors and achieve publication.

Our scientific editing services for the authors of a wide variety of scientific journal papers are especially popular, but we also offer book editing services and have the experience and expertise to proofread and edit manuscripts in all scholarly disciplines, as well as beyond them. We have team members who specialise in medical editing and bioscience editing, and some of our experts dedicate their time exclusively to PhD proofreading and master’s proofreading, offering research students the opportunity to improve their use of formatting and language through the most exacting thesis editing and dissertation proofreading practices. Whether you are preparing a conference paper for presentation, polishing a progress report to share with colleagues, or facing the daunting task of editing and perfecting any kind of scholarly document for publication, a qualified member of our professional team can provide invaluable assistance and give you greater confidence in your written work.



topbanner errow